A few days ago I found this post on one page on Facebook devoted to Avril Lavigne-
The post talks about Avril, but obviously with Avril just change you name and address does not change.
- oh my God, I hate this guy, making music business.
- already, and then ... do not listen to some music that is as rottenness.
then, explain to those who have published such a crap that the music business is not a crime.
plus and explain to the fans of Avril, her music is commercial, in every way, and there is NIEEENTE wrong with that.
I personally listen to commercial music every single day since it step by Avril 30 seconds to mars.
but I do not understand you, 12enni laid down by the fact that if a song is labeled commercial then it sucks. And since
AVRIL E 'DEA OUR MUSIC THEN SHE DOES NOT COMMERCIAL. Rovinj
now telling you that your dream is -
why deny something so only because he is my idol seems stupid.
Boh.
Sorry, I had to vent somewhere.
Well, this post puts his finger, perhaps in a somewhat 'spontaneous, a little' emotional, one of the clichés and false arguments that are all the rage.
Or the catalog as a thing to despise the music business.
make it clear: since there is a cultural industry, or industries producing and trading in mass culture (books, films, discs, DVD, Play Station, CD-Rom, blue ray, etc etc) our culture, mass culture and pop, as they say in America, is closely linked and tied to trade. Books
discs and movies are made because some (many) will read / hear / see.
Umberto Eco is commercial, commercial and The Beatles are so pure, Avatar and Titanic are commercial.
Lo and Shakira (who I adore, mind you) and is (as she says above), Avril Lavigne.
do not like, do not buy that product!
But do not break the soul saying that you do not buy things because business is pure hypocrisy.
One might say: but quality?
The quality certainly does not depend on the success, neither positive nor negative.
Jaws is a commercial film (B of serious snob would say the ordinance), but is also a masterpiece. Idem
Avatar, Titanic, Psycho etc etc. I am not the
cinepanettoni, but not because they are commercial, just because they are mundane and repetitive, without wisdom, without any taste film,
So it is one thing being a commercial product, it is one thing being a poor product , which may very well be the products of limited success. And who knows if
Aristophanes and Shakespeare at the time were not considered commercial or too popular for their time.
likely that there will be assessments of 20,40,100 years will be very different from today, and I do not do historical examples that there would be in clusters.
For example, when the criticism came Psycho Hitchcook killed him saying that it was an indelible stain on the career of the Master. Twenty years after he was declared one of the greatest films of all time.
But here we enter into the evaluations of the critics, that's another story.
0 comments:
Post a Comment